Normally, the process of research involves the
following five steps:
(1) Problem Definition:
There should be clear idea
about the problem we are facing. In general, it refers to some difficulty which
researcher experiences in the
context of either a theoretical or practical situation and wants to obtain a
solution for the same. The components of research problem are:
- There must be an individual or a group which has
some difficulty or the problem.
- There must be some objectives(s) to be attained
at. If one wants nothing, one can not have a problem.
- There must be alternative means for obtaining
the objective(s) one wises to attain.
- There must remain some doubt in the mind of a
researcher with regard to the selection of alternative.
- There must be some environment(s) to which the
difficulty pertains.
(2) Research Design:
Decisions regarding what,
where, when, how much, by what means concerning an inquiry or a
research study constitute a research
design. A research design is the
arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a manner that
aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure.
This is the blue print for the research.
The basic issues addressed in research design are-
·
Should
the research environment be internally disturbed by the researcher in specified
ways an experimental design?
·
How
many observations should be made on each unit in the study? When?
·
Should
a single sample be chosen from the total population or should a series of samples
be chosen from various subgroup of the population?
·
Should
a probability or non-probability sampling procedure be adopted for the study?
(3) Data Collection:
The task of data collection
begins after a research problem has
been defined and research design plan
checked out. While deciding about the method of data collection to be used for
the study, the researcher should keep in mind two types of data viz. Primary
and Secondary. The primary data are those which are collected afresh and for the
first time, and thus happen to be original in character. The secondary
data, on the other hand, are those which have already been collected by
someone else and which have already been passed through the statistical
process. The researcher would have to decide which sort of data he would be
using for his study and accordingly he will have to select one or the other
method of data collection. The method of collecting primary and secondary data
differ since primary data are to be originally collected while in case of secondary
data the nature of data collection work is merely that of compilation. Errors
associated with data are typically classified into two categories: Sampling and
Non-sampling errors, which can be minimize thorough appropriate research plan.
(4) Data Analysis:
The data, after collection,
has to be processed and analyzed in accordance with the outline laid down for
the purpose at the time of developing the research
plan. This is essential for a scientific study and for ensuring that we
have all relevant data for making contemplated comparisons and analysis.
Processing implies editing, coding, classification and tabulation of collected
data so that they are items under investigation. Data analysis can be
conveniently classified as under (a) Univariate
analysis which deals with a single characteristic of interest. (b) Bivariate analysis which deals with two
characteristic of interest & (c) Multivariate
analysis deals with more than two characteristics of interest.
(5) Interpretation of results:
Interpretation refers to the
task of drawing inferences from the collected facts after an analytical and or experimental study.
In fact, it is a search for broader meaning of research findings. The task of interpretation has two major aspects
viz. (i) the effort to establish continuity in research through linking the
results of a given study with those of another and (ii) the establishment of
some explanatory concepts. The usefulness and utility of research findings lie in proper interpretation. It is being
considered a basic component of research process because of the following
reasons:
(a) It is through interpretation that the researcher can well understand the
abstract principle that works beneath his findings.
(b) Interpretation leads to the
establishment of explanatory concepts that can serve as a guide for future research studies.
(c) Researcher can better appreciate only though interpretation why
his findings are what they are and can make others to understand the real
significance of his research findings.
(d) The interpretation of the findings of exploratory research study often
results into hypothesis for experimental
research and as such interpretation is involved in the transition from
explanatory to experimental research.
Now, let’s try to our
research work to make a brilliant decision and enjoy!
===================0==================================
0 comments:
Post a Comment